9 June 2017: The Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA) pre-election review of the parties’ manifesto pledges noted that there were few measures to boost private pension savings and savings generally. The Association says the uncertain outcome of the general election means the brave decisions that are needed to address policy challenges affecting employers and the public in the pensions, savings and social care arenas will not be grasped
ACA Chairman, Bob Scott, commented:
“On State pensions, we were looking for a quick decision, delayed because of the election, on whether the State Pension Age increase to age 68 would be brought forward and how future changes might then progress. That now looks to be in serious doubt as to whether there will be any increase at all beyond current plans without a further review, which will mean the longer-term budget to meet an ongoing triple-lock will rise sharply for the taxpayers of tomorrow.
“On private pensions, we wanted the 2017 review of auto-enrolment (AE), scheduled for later this year, to encompass a plan to increase minimum contributions gradually over the years ahead. A review that just examines the scope of AE and minor policy details would be a major lost opportunity. AE contributions need to increase markedly, otherwise we are simply building a retirement income crisis for the future. Again, we’re not clear that there will be any resolve to progress policy beyond widening coverage to the self-employed and those on lower incomes.
“We also felt the Government must act decisively to help employers to continue to offer defined benefit pensions – many millions of people still rely on the solid income they provide. Adding to regulatory powers based on a very few hard cases has proved ill-advised in the past and will likely be so in the future. Indeed, we are concerned that more high-profile regulation will be seen as the easy option over any easements to employers.
“The two major parties said nothing in their manifestos about pension taxation, but we remain worried that this will continue to be seen as an area where ‘easy money’ can be harvested to meet spending commitments with annual tweaks making long term savings overly complex. We have argued the case for a stable, simpler savings strategy without competing savings products and where locking money away for the long term is appropriately rewarded.
“On social care, a consultation is certainly needed so we can fix on a sustainable policy for decades ahead. We believe this will involve a range of solutions suited to individuals of different ages and with different financial backgrounds and requirements. The inter-generational issue has to be addressed as part of this. I am sure this is an area where our members can help in identifying policy options. However, we are unsure there is any resolve to progress policy reforms in a complex area where, as we saw during the election campaign, it’s easy to present a sensible policy in a most unfavourable light.”
During the election campaign the ACA published its own ‘wish list’ manifesto, which features in Placard (Issue 36) available at www.aca.org.uk (see ‘latest publications’), which also reviewed the manifesto pledges of the main parties.
About the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA)
Members of the ACA provide advice to thousands of pension schemes, including most of the country’s largest schemes. Members of the Association are all qualified actuaries and all actuarial advice given is subject to the Actuaries’ Code. Advice given to clients is independent and impartial. ACA members include the scheme actuaries to schemes covering the majority of members of private sector defined benefit pension schemes.
The ACA is the representative body for UK consulting actuaries, whilst the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries is the professional body.
Disclaimer
This document is intended to provide general information and guidance only. It does not constitute legal or business advice and should not be relied upon as such. Responding to or acting upon information or guidance in this document does not constitute or imply any client /advisor relationship between the Association of Consulting Actuaries and/or the Association of Consulting Actuaries Limited and any party, nor does the Association accept any liability to any person or organisation relating to the use of such information or guidance.
Association of Consulting Actuaries Limited × First Floor (129) × 40 Gracechurch Street × London × EC3V 0BT
We are looking for essays of no more than 1,500 words on exploring innovative ideas to improve the provision, public understanding and take-up of longer-term and shorter-term pension and savings and/or overall savings adequacy at all levels of UK society. This must be presented in writing although entrants can support their essay with a video if they so wish.
The winner of the Essay Prize will receive an award of £3,000 and the two runners-up will receive awards of £1,500 each. The Winners will have the opportunity to present their entries at the ACA Bloomfield Lecture being held on 3 November 2026 at a central London venue.
The winning essay submission also will be published in TheActuary journal, alongside articles from leading writers working in the insurance, savings and pension industries from across the world.
Format
Your essay must be:
Your individual work.
Papers written for courses are eligible, but all papers must be the original, unpublished work of the individual student.
Submitted in Microsoft Word or PDF in English and can be supported by visual elements which will not go towards the word count.
Any visual material in your essay (e.g. photographs, PowerPoint or Excel charts) must be fully embedded within your Word or PDF document; do not include embedded objects that rely on external source files.
Text-based hyperlinks are permitted.
Entries must be submitted online through the essay competition email, which will be open from 30 March 12:00 am to 30 June 11:59 pm. Late submissions will not be accepted.
Submitted with an application form.
Submitted without your name on the essay document.
All pages must be typed and include the title of the essay and page numbers.
Double line spacing.
Submissions will be judged anonymously so please do not include any personally identifying information (name, university) in the essay document.
A maximum of 1,500 words.
The prize winners may be requested to grant permission for the ACA to have the right to publish or reproduce at any time all or part of the award-winning entries.
Your word count:
Must be included at the foot of the essay.
Includes the main body of the essay and annexes.
Excludes the title and footnotes (for example citations and brief references to other research).
Footnotes to be no more than 25 words each.
Use of generative AI tools: your essay must be your sole creation and original work. AI may be used for research, proofreading and checking spelling and grammar. If an entrant chooses to use generative AI, the entrant is responsible for checking the accuracy of the output. Entrants are not permitted to use any AI programme to write all or part of an essay to enter this competition. Any essay which has been written, in part or in whole, by ChatGPT or similar programmes will be excluded from the marking and judging process and ineligible. The view of the judges will be final.
References should be inserted using the Harvard style referencing system.
Reworked coursework, journals or articles: each essay must be an original piece of work written by the entrant for the competition without peer review or editing by anyone else. All essays must be the individual unpublished work of the entrant.
Eligibility criteria
When the essay is submitted and at the date of the close of the competition, you must satisfy the following criteria:
The competition is open to all undergraduate and graduate students who, at the time of entry, are enrolled full- or part-time at an UK accredited, degree-granting institution of higher education seeking an undergraduate (two-, three- or four-year) or graduate degree.
Students may be enrolled in any discipline. Students enrolled in life science, physical science, social science, health, actuarial or mathematics courses are especially encouraged to participate.
Students may be enrolled in any UK accredited college or university.
We will only transfer the prize money to you if you are successful once confirmation of your eligibility to enter the competition has been received from one of the UK academic institutions (see 1 above).
The administration team and the judges have the final decision as to whether an essay is eligible. No correspondence will be entered into.
Judging
Essays will be evaluated for:
Clarity
Analysis and reasoning
Originality and creativity
Compliance with competition requirements
Judges for the competition will be drawn from senior professionals, academics and commentators working in the pensions and savings world.
Plagiarism policy
The essay must be the sole creation and original work of the entrant. Entrants are expected already to be aware of and to follow any plagiarism guidance and policies of the academic and professional training institutions to which they currently belong or have belonged. The ACA guidance reproduces and adapts information from other such policies for the purposes of its Essay Competition. The ACA is grateful to both institutions for permission to do so.
Plagiarism occurs where an entrant copies from any other source (published or unpublished) in an unauthorised manner and attempts to present that work as if it were the entrant’s own in order to obtain an unfair advantage.
Examples of plagiarism include:
Submitting someone else’s work as your own.
Copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit.
Failing to put a quotation in quotation marks.
Giving misleading information about the source of a quotation.
Changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit.
Copying so many words from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not.
Quotations from recognised sources are usually acceptable but must be clearly acknowledged and a reference given for the source (i.e. sources must be cited). The following situations almost always require citation:
Whenever you use quotes.
Whenever you paraphrase.
Whenever you use an idea that someone else has already expressed.
Whenever you make specific reference to the work of another.
Whenever someone else’s work has been critical in developing your own ideas.
In the case of any doubt, citation is recommended.
The ACA may proactively seek out instances of plagiarism, for example by the use of an electronic plagiarism detection system or service to scan submitted essays.
Any entry which is found not to be the sole creation and original work of the entrant (“plagiarism”) will be disqualified from the 75th Anniversary ‘Future of Pensions’ Essay Competition.
Data protection notice
Our purposes for processing your data: we will process your personal data for the purposes of administering this essay competition and (in the case of successful entrants) publicising and promoting future such competitions. Our lawful basis for this processing data is ‘legitimate interests’ on the basis that individuals would have a reasonable expectation that we will process the personal data they have provided, which include the provision of initiatives to support education and training and to promote innovation in actuarial and related fields. Please go to our privacy statement for more details.
Association of Consulting Actuaries Second Floor (206) • 40 Gracechurch Street • London EC3V 0BT Tel: 020 3102 6763 • www.aca.org.uk • david.robertson@aca.org.uk
“On State pensions, we were looking for a quick decision, delayed because of the election, on whether the State Pension Age increase to age 68 would be brought forward and how future changes might then progress. That now looks to be in serious doubt as to whether there will be any increase at all beyond current plans without a further review, which will mean the longer-term budget to meet an ongoing triple-lock will rise sharply for the taxpayers of tomorrow.