Please find below links to Association responses to consultations conducted by Government Departments and other bodies. Providing input and comment on public policy and topical issues is one of the principal roles of the Association. These responses to a wide range of government departments, regulatory and other bodies are archived below in date order:
Consultation Responses
ACA makes pre-Autumn 2024 Budget submission
We have responded to HM Treasury’s consultative process with the following submission ahead of 30 October Budget: more »»
We have responded to HM Treasury’s consultative process with the following submission ahead of 30 October Budget:
ACA response to IFoA QAS PC consultation
We have responded to the IFoA consultation on the possibility of the introduction of a streamlined Practising Certificate Scheme for employees of QAS accredited organisations. See below… more »»
We have responded to the IFoA consultation on the possibility of the introduction of a streamlined Practising Certificate Scheme for employees of QAS accredited organisations. See below…
ACA responds to Raising standards in the tax advice market
We have responded to the consultation on Raising Standards in the Tax Advice Market: strengthening the regulatory framework and improving registration, published on 6 March 2024, as follows: more »»
We have responded to the consultation on Raising Standards in the Tax Advice Market: strengthening the regulatory framework and improving registration, published on 6 March 2024, as follows:
ACA responds to Options for DB Schemes consultation
We have responded to the DWP consultation as follows: more »»
We have responded to the DWP consultation as follows:
ACA response to Statement of Strategy consultation
Our response is critical as to whether a highly prescriptive, data-driven submission that goes beyond regulatory requirements is the way to go at the very introduction of the funding and investment strategy as an add-on to the well-established scheme funding Read More ... more »»
Our response is critical as to whether a highly prescriptive, data-driven submission that goes beyond regulatory requirements is the way to go at the very introduction of the funding and investment strategy as an add-on to the well-established scheme funding Read More …
ACA responds to evidence call on Looking to the future: greater member security and rebalancing risk
The key points we make relate to the “pot for life” initiative. While we remain open minded on the potential attractions of such a model, we do have a number of key concerns outlined in our response below… more »»
The key points we make relate to the “pot for life” initiative. While we remain open minded on the potential attractions of such a model, we do have a number of key concerns outlined in our response below…
ACA responds to evidence call on Pension fund clearing exemption
We responded to the evidence call by noting that if the exemption was to expire then it is likely to create operational burdens and bottlenecks to implement and we believe on balance it will bring more costs than benefits. In Read More ... more »»
We responded to the evidence call by noting that if the exemption was to expire then it is likely to create operational burdens and bottlenecks to implement and we believe on balance it will bring more costs than benefits. In Read More …
ACA responds to FRC AS TM1: Statutory Money Purchase Illustrations consultation
We have responded to the above consultation on the proposed version 5.1 of AS TM1 as below: . more »»
We have responded to the above consultation on the proposed version 5.1 of AS TM1 as below: .
ACA responds to Considering Social Factors in Pension Scheme Investments consultation
We have responded to the consultation on the Guide from the Taskforce on Social Factors. We have provided our thoughts on the overall guide in the letter below: . more »»
We have responded to the consultation on the Guide from the Taskforce on Social Factors. We have provided our thoughts on the overall guide in the letter below: .
ACA opts for General Levy option 2 whilst bemoaning lack of transparency on emerging deficit
Responding to the DWP Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (General Levy) Regulations review 2023, we favour option 2 of those put forward, whilst bemoaning the lack of transparency on how the Levy deficit has emerged. We are highly critical about Read More ... more »»
Responding to the DWP Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (General Levy) Regulations review 2023, we favour option 2 of those put forward, whilst bemoaning the lack of transparency on how the Levy deficit has emerged. We are highly critical about Read More …

