Please find below links to Association responses to consultations conducted by Government Departments and other bodies. Providing input and comment on public policy and topical issues is one of the principal roles of the Association. These responses to a wide range of government departments, regulatory and other bodies are archived below in date order:
Consultation Responses
Response to FRC call for feedback on Technical Actuarial Standards
See below our comments on the FRC’s Call for Feedback on the Technical Actuarial Standards… more »»
See below our comments on the FRC’s Call for Feedback on the Technical Actuarial Standards…
ACA response to Strengthening the Pensions Regulator’s Powers: Contribution Notice and Information Gathering Powers Regulations 2021
We have responded to the DWP consultation as below: more »»
We have responded to the DWP consultation as below:
ACA responds to Implementation of the change in Normal Minimum Pension Age consultation
We have responded to the consultation expressing a number of concerns, see more »»
We have responded to the consultation expressing a number of concerns, see
ACA critical of lack of clarity in TPR Criminal Offences draft guidance
In our response to the TPR’s consultation on the investigation and prosecution of the new criminal offences guidance, we express agreement with TPR’s high-level policy intent, but more clarity needs to be added to the details of the policy, given Read More ... more »»
In our response to the TPR’s consultation on the investigation and prosecution of the new criminal offences guidance, we express agreement with TPR’s high-level policy intent, but more clarity needs to be added to the details of the policy, given Read More …
ACA responds to Incorporating Performance Fees Within the Charge Cap
We have responded to the DWP consultation on Incorporating Performance Fees within the Charge Cap noting a number of concerns… more »»
We have responded to the DWP consultation on Incorporating Performance Fees within the Charge Cap noting a number of concerns…
ACA expresses support in OTS response for ‘sensible’ initiatives to simplify pension tax system
In our response to the Office of Tax Simplification’s call for evidence on its third-party data reporting review, we expressed support for any ‘sensible’ initiatives to simplify the processes of the pensions tax system and make it easier for individuals Read More ... more »»
In our response to the Office of Tax Simplification’s call for evidence on its third-party data reporting review, we expressed support for any ‘sensible’ initiatives to simplify the processes of the pensions tax system and make it easier for individuals Read More …
ACA response to Taking action on climate risk: improving governance and reporting by occupational pension schemes,
In our response to the DWP consultation we welcomed the DWP’s response to practical issues identified in its previous paper but stress the huge changes for trustees addressing this issue and the risks involved with ‘spurious data gathering and calculations’ Read More ... more »»
In our response to the DWP consultation we welcomed the DWP’s response to practical issues identified in its previous paper but stress the huge changes for trustees addressing this issue and the risks involved with ‘spurious data gathering and calculations’ Read More …
ACA response to General Levy consultation
In our view, there should be an opportunity for industry scrutiny of whether the regulatory activities paid for by the general levy represent adequate value for money. We would argue that levy payers deserve some role in this process, to Read More ... more »»
In our view, there should be an opportunity for industry scrutiny of whether the regulatory activities paid for by the general levy represent adequate value for money. We would argue that levy payers deserve some role in this process, to Read More …
ACA responds to APS P1 review
We are in favour of the revised version and welcome the streamlining and clarity. We have a few areas where we think the drafting as stands might result in unintended consequences and these are set out in our response, see more »»
We are in favour of the revised version and welcome the streamlining and clarity. We have a few areas where we think the drafting as stands might result in unintended consequences and these are set out in our response, see
ACA responds to TPR strategy paper
We broadly agree with the strategic priorities set out in the document. Whilst we agree that TPR should continue to increase its oversight of DC pension savings, we envisage that DB pensions will continue to require significant regulatory oversight for Read More ... more »»
We broadly agree with the strategic priorities set out in the document. Whilst we agree that TPR should continue to increase its oversight of DC pension savings, we envisage that DB pensions will continue to require significant regulatory oversight for Read More …

